Vehicles, machinery, tech, tools — asset finance lets you put business-critical equipment to work immediately while the cost is spread over its working life.
Find Funding
Under hire purchase you are buying the asset over time and you own it at the end. The asset generally goes on your balance sheet, you can usually claim capital allowances on it, and only the interest element is a deductible cost. It suits equipment with a long useful life that you intend to keep.
Under an operating lease you are renting. You never own it, the rentals are generally deductible as an expense, and at the end you hand it back or re-lease. It suits anything that dates quickly, anything you replace on a cycle, and anything where obsolescence is a bigger risk than cost.
The tax and accounting treatment differs enough between the two that the cheaper headline rate is frequently not the cheaper deal. It is worth putting both options in front of whoever prepares your accounts before signing, not after — the decision is effectively irreversible once the agreement starts.
Buying outright looks cheapest because there is no interest. What it costs instead is the use of that money for the life of the asset. Cash spent on a van is cash not available for stock, wages or a contract that needs funding up front — and unlike the van, those things generate return quickly.
The comparison worth making is not finance cost against zero. It is finance cost against what the same cash would earn if it stayed in the business. For a business that is growing and short of working capital, that comparison usually favours financing the depreciating asset and keeping the cash for the things that produce revenue.
Your Found Funding profile is matched against Swoop's panel of banks, alternative lenders, equity funds and grant agencies — one search instead of one application at a time.
Paying cash ties up working capital in a depreciating asset, and the comparison worth making is not finance cost against zero. It is finance cost against what that same money would earn if it stayed in the business. Cash spent on a van is cash not available for stock, wages, or a contract that needs funding up front — and unlike the van, those things generate a return quickly. For a business that is growing and short of working capital, that comparison usually favours financing the depreciating asset and keeping the cash for the things that produce revenue. For a business sitting on surplus cash with no growth plans, the answer may well be different.
Neither is better in the abstract — they are different deals and the right one depends on the asset. Under hire purchase you are buying over time and own it outright at the end: it generally sits on your balance sheet, you can usually claim capital allowances, and only the interest is a deductible cost. Under an operating lease you are renting: you never own it, rentals are generally deductible as an expense, and at the end you hand it back or re-lease. Hire purchase suits equipment with a long life that you intend to keep; leasing suits anything that dates quickly or that you replace on a cycle. Because the tax and accounting treatment differs, the cheaper headline rate is frequently not the cheaper deal — worth putting both in front of whoever prepares your accounts before you sign.
More easily than they can get an unsecured loan, which surprises people. Because the facility is secured on the asset itself, the funder can recover if payments stop, so the decision leans on the asset's resale value as much as on your trading record. That makes asset finance one of the more accessible products for a business without years of accounts behind it. A personal guarantee from a director is likely, and a deposit is common — often ten to twenty per cent. The more liquid the secondhand market for the item, the easier the decision: a standard van is straightforward, a piece of bespoke tooling with no resale market is not.
It takes a few minutes to see what your business is eligible for. Free, impartial, no pressure.
Find Funding